Is there a prima facie obligation to obey the law summary

1. Is there a prima facie obligation to obey the law Smith summary?
2. What is a prima facie obligation to obey the law?
3. Do we have an obligation to obey the law?
4. Why does Rawls say we have an obligation to obey unjust laws?
5. Do we have an obligation to obey an unjust law?
6. What is general obligation to obey the law?
7. How do you explain prima facie?
8. What does it mean to obey the law?
9. What does prima facie refer to?
10. Is obeying laws a responsibility or an obligation?
11. Why is it our responsibility to obey the law?
12. Is obeying the law a right or responsibility?
13. Which of the following are Ross prima facie obligations?
14. How does Ross think we can come to know prima facie duties?
15. How do we know what our prima facie duties are?
16. How many prima facie duties are there?
17. What is the difference between prima facie and actual duties?
18. What is the difference between absolute and prima facie duties?

Is there a prima facie obligation to obey the law Smith summary?

Government can't long last in the face of wide spread disobedience, so obedience supports the continued existence of government and, hence, always has good consequences. So, there is a prima facie obligation to obey the law. to perform optimific acts (those whose consequences are better than the alternatives).

What is a prima facie obligation to obey the law?

It means that S has a moral reason to do X which is such that, unless he has a moral reason not to do X at least as strong as his reason to do X, S's failure to do X is wrong. • Prima facie obligations can be overridden by stronger moral.

Do we have an obligation to obey the law?

All legal systems claim to bind people subject to them; part of what we mean by a valid law is that the relevant population is required to obey it. This requirement is generally supported by coercion, while those who do not obey are subject to sanctions.

Why does Rawls say we have an obligation to obey unjust laws?

So we generally are obligated to obey unjust laws, because they are a necessary result of just political procedures, which we have an obligation to support. We are justified in disobeying unjust laws only when their injustice reflects a betrayal of the principles governing fair and equal social cooperation.

Do we have an obligation to obey an unjust law?

One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.

What is general obligation to obey the law?

Some legal philosophers argue that there a general moral obligation to obey the law- that the fact that a law demands certain behaviour should be morally important to us regardless of what the law actually says.

How do you explain prima facie?

A Latin term meaning "at first sight" or "at first look." This refers to the standard of proof under which the party with the burden of proof need only present enough evidence to create a rebuttable presumption that the matter asserted is true.

What does it mean to obey the law?

In order to obey the law a person must act with some recognition that she is in fact doing an action that the law requires. In a phrase, obedience requires knowingly doing the right thing.

What does prima facie refer to?

Prima facie is a Latin word, used to mean 'at first sight' or 'on its face'. Prima facie evidence is evidence that, on initial examination, appears to sufficiently corroborate a case as to warrant its hearing.

Is obeying laws a responsibility or an obligation?

A duty (also called an obligation) is something that a citizen is required to do, by law. Examples of duties/obligations are: obeying laws, paying taxes, defending the nation and serving on juries. Rule of Law: Everyone is under the law. To obey the law, you must know the law.

Why is it our responsibility to obey the law?

Obeying the law, according to them, is a way for us to discharge the duty of gratitude we owe our own state for the benefits we receive from it (Plato [Crito]; W.

Is obeying the law a right or responsibility?

“One has not only a legal, but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws.” – Martin Luther King, Jr.

Which of the following are Ross prima facie obligations?

Ross describes various prima facie duties such as reparation, self-improvement, and justice.

How does Ross think we can come to know prima facie duties?

We apprehend our prima facie duties in much the same way that we apprehend the axioms of mathematics or geometry: we do so by reflecting on "the self-evident prima facie rightness of an individual act of a particular type."

How do we know what our prima facie duties are?

Whether an act is a duty proper or actual duty depends on all the morally significant kinds it is an instance of.” An act is a prima facie duty when there is a moral reason in favor of doing the act, but one that can be outweighed by other moral reasons.

How many prima facie duties are there?

Ross's theory, a variant of intuitionism, recognized five prima facie duties: fidelity, reparation, gratitude, nonmaleficence (avoiding what harms, or produces badness), and beneficence (doing what benefits, or produces goodness).

What is the difference between prima facie and actual duties?

Basically, if you have an actual duty, you must do it. If you have a prima facie duty, you should do it unless you have a better reason not to.

What is the difference between absolute and prima facie duties?

A prima facie right is a right that can be outweighed by other considerations. It stands in contrast with absolute rights, which cannot be outweighed by anything. Some authors consider an absolute right as a prima facie right, but one that cannot be outweighed in any possible situation.